Why MRC doesn't appear at MSX Rating?

Página 2/3
1 | | 3

Por MäSäXi

Paragon (1884)

imagem de MäSäXi

12-05-2006, 16:10

check also regions and languages part, and you will be surprised! (or then maybe not..Wink)

Por ro

Scribe (4540)

imagem de ro

12-05-2006, 16:11

oh grow up

Por Niles

Hero (545)

imagem de Niles

12-05-2006, 17:18

You wonder why MRC doesn't appear at MSX Rating?

Well, here is the answer:

www.google.com/trends?q=mrc%2C+shit&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all

That´s why. :)

You're so impressive... :evil:
Incredibles and amazings statistics on the Net

Por Niles

Hero (545)

imagem de Niles

12-05-2006, 17:19

All this stuff of google trends stinks

Por [D-Tail]

Ascended (8255)

imagem de [D-Tail]

12-05-2006, 18:06

Niles: I believe you're right Smile

Por MäSäXi

Paragon (1884)

imagem de MäSäXi

12-05-2006, 21:42

oh grow up

why, I don´t want to grow up, being "adult" is so damn boring. Smile

Seems like you people take things too seriously. Wink

Por Fudeba

Expert (113)

imagem de Fudeba

13-05-2006, 19:57

"It looks like the server hosting the ratings is not exactly one with the capacity for high volume traffic. Linking MRC on there might overload it. So maybe it's best to leave it off that list."

You just can´t be serious. I previously hosted BlogRating service, which had about 350.000 to 500.000 accesses per day. For several months I had about 40GB of upload per month. I believe MSX RC has many accesses, but it certainly do not reach this mark. However, the system now works in a different way (it is now more secure and reliable, at the cost of a higher server load), and cannot match that amount of accesses anymore; but I believe it can cope with a few tens of thousands of accesses per day. Why don´t you register MRC on MSX Rating and take it off, *if* the server do not hold the traffic? It´ll cause no harm.

About competition, the MSX Rating idea is *not* competition, but only register a daily status, so new users can learn what are the most visited (and probably best) MSX sites on the net, at a given time. I really think MSX RC would be welcome at MSX Rating, even if it would be always the first.

And I hope the fact our service is being hosted in Brazil is not the reason why MSX RC not became a MSX Rating member. (BTW: the problems I had weeks ago are not related to my server, but related to the incredibly bad commercial internet link service proviveded by Telefonica. At a very high price, I must add.)

Por Sonic_aka_T

Enlighted (4130)

imagem de Sonic_aka_T

13-05-2006, 22:42

"It looks like the server hosting the ratings is not exactly one with the capacity for high volume traffic. Linking MRC on there might overload it. So maybe it's best to leave it off that list."

You just can´t be serious. I previously hosted BlogRating service, which had about 350.000 to 500.000 accesses per day. For several months I had about 40GB of upload per month. I believe MSX RC has many accesses, but it certainly do not reach this mark. However, the system now works in a different way (it is now more secure and reliable, at the cost of a higher server load), and cannot match that amount of accesses anymore; but I believe it can cope with a few tens of thousands of accesses per day. Why don´t you register MRC on MSX Rating and take it off, *if* the server do not hold the traffic? It´ll cause no harm.I don't know about the rest of the world, but just now it took 21 seconds to load the http://www.caetano.eng.br/services/msxrating/ page. This is actually quite fast; the first time I checked it it was almost a minute.

www.caetano.eng.br/services/msxrating/msxrating.php?id=1337

That picture takes about 3-4 seconds to load as well. I guess that's, well, a lot...

Por Fudeba

Expert (113)

imagem de Fudeba

14-05-2006, 01:07

Well, then the World backbone to outside is very crappy because anywhere I tested in Brazil it loads in less than a second.

Por Fudeba

Expert (113)

imagem de Fudeba

14-05-2006, 01:42

Ops... World backbone no, Telefonica. Smile

Página 2/3
1 | | 3