Request a wiki

Page 9/17
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14

Par Guillian

Prophet (3517)

Portrait de Guillian

03-08-2016, 13:41

Without explanation? You just need to read:

I wonder why you affirm that all models are not gold plated? Can you explain your reasons?

So, for your information, and hopping you stop posting false information in the Wiki and undoing my changes (for whatever reasons you have):

MegaFlashROM generations
-1st: Konami SCC, ASCII, SRAM (Gold plated)
-2nd: Konami SCC (Gold plated)
-3rd: ASCII 1024 (Gold plated)
-4th: SCC+ (Some batches gold plated)
-5th: SCC+ SD (Some batches gold plated)

Par Wolverine_nl

Paragon (1160)

Portrait de Wolverine_nl

03-08-2016, 14:02

People, remember the wiki is also to get the most complete library about all things MSX together in one place, so if there are exceptions, those should be in there as well. Everyone puts extra info or changes to things that might be forgotten or that someone else doesn't know exists.
Keep an open mind and there is no need for irritations and such. Also, as Guillian points out, read the history info to see why something is updated.
It is alsways a good idea if someone changes something, to put a reason why or what was changed/updated.
my 2 cents. Smile

Par gdx

Enlighted (6215)

Portrait de gdx

03-08-2016, 14:30

Sorry but You seem to hide something. Does this sentence is more appropriate: "Some models and/or batches has tinned contacts. The newers versions seems to have gold plated contacts." or it comes randomly?

Par mars2000you

Enlighted (6487)

Portrait de mars2000you

03-08-2016, 14:49

There is indeed a big difference between deleting a sentence and correcting it with more precisions. In other words, why Guillian does not include himself these precisions in the Wiki instead of deleting a partially wrong sentence ? Especially after having finally given these precisions in the forum under the 'pressure' of GDX ???

Par Guillian

Prophet (3517)

Portrait de Guillian

03-08-2016, 15:22

Hidden information? Pressure? XD

Well, the question is why he put wrong infomation and lies about all models?
Why he said there was any explanation about the changes when in fact there was?
Why he is not hummble enough to apologize when he is wrong (now and in the past)?
And why mars take part to defend him when "under pressure"?

Why are you both so resentful?

The team rocket is here again! Let get some pokemons! Running Naked in a Field of Flowers

Par mars2000you

Enlighted (6487)

Portrait de mars2000you

03-08-2016, 15:35

You write here on the forum this :

Quote:

MegaFlashROM generations
-1st: Konami SCC, ASCII, SRAM (Gold plated)
-2nd: Konami SCC (Gold plated)
-3rd: ASCII 1024 (Gold plated)
-4th: SCC+ (Some batches gold plated)
-5th: SCC+ SD (Some batches gold plated)

So, if the words have still some meaning, 'some batches gold plated' has as consequence that 'some other batches are not gold plated'. What's the interest to not include in the Wiki the precisions you give in the forum?

Not including them = hiding that 'some batches of the 2 more recent generations are not gold plated'
And hiding that is a form a lie, it's a lie by omission! Just the contrary of what a Wiki should be !

Par Wolverine_nl

Paragon (1160)

Portrait de Wolverine_nl

03-08-2016, 15:48

mars has a point, the more info about stuff, the better, no reason keep it to yourself or to minorities it. People want to read the complete story/facts.
Wouldn't call it lying, more like not wanting to bash certain producers of the hardware (eventhough no names were called).
I see no point in discussing, the more you know, the better it should be documented...for history sake Wink

Par Guillian

Prophet (3517)

Portrait de Guillian

03-08-2016, 15:59

What is the interest of stating that ALL are not gold plated when most of the units actually are?
What is the interest of defending that wrong information?

I have no problem updating the wiki and fix wrong information. As you can see it is not a secret.

Par gdx

Enlighted (6215)

Portrait de gdx

03-08-2016, 16:13

Guillian wrote:

Well, the question is why he put wrong infomation and lies about all models?

This is not false information but incomplete information. Delete this information makes a more incomplete information.

Guillian wrote:

Why he said there was any explanation about the changes when in fact there was?

This explanation was not convincing. I had seen several pictures but all no gold-plated.

Guillian wrote:

PWhy he is not hummble enough to apologize when he is wrong (now and in the past)?

"Sorry" is not enough?

Why do not you answer the question?

Par Jorito

Mr. Ambassadors (1790)

Portrait de Jorito

04-08-2016, 08:00

People, cool down and stop making accusations to each other about something so trivial, or we'll give you a one week ban to help you cool down. First and only warning. Thank you.

Page 9/17
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14