Now it reads "Seiko/Epson" but that can't be right as those firms merged year after the printer was made. As in the box there reads Seikosha, I would not see problem using that name... or something like "Seikosha as part of Seiko group"
"In November 1985, Suwa Seikosha Co., Ltd. and the Epson Corporation merged to form Seiko Epson Corporation"
(Problem fixed now by gdx)
How do you know that Philips printers are made by Seikosha? (not Epson or other)
It's a question for Rderooy (I don't have created these pages).
@gdx: there's a problem to display these pictures in the wiki:
https://www.msx.org/wiki/File:Elecom_JC-AD2.jpg
https://www.msx.org/wiki/File:Elecom_JC-AD1.jpg
The thumbnails are not created....
Besides, impossible to download the files on my computer ..... Maybe you have forgotten to change their properties....
I don't have this issue here.
Ehmmm.... it seems to be a problem with one of my Chrome extensions.
You're very nice in Mars2000 but I am strives to put the categories in order from the main to the least relevant but you change everything each time in an order that is not at all relevant.
It doesn't make sense to put the brand or the company name first. It's already sorted in that order and it's indicated on each link.
Since so many years, we have build the Wiki this way with the name of the companies as first category and suddenly after so much time you change your mind! Where's the logic in that???
I can understand the change but if you want coherency, do this change for all the products of a company first, then go to the next company.
So what ? This is not the first time that it has been necessary to change badly classified or badly thought out things.