Wiki editing discussion

Page 95/118
88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100

By NYYRIKKI

Enlighted (5776)

NYYRIKKI's picture

07-01-2021, 08:25

Now it reads "Seiko/Epson" but that can't be right as those firms merged year after the printer was made. As in the box there reads Seikosha, I would not see problem using that name... or something like "Seikosha as part of Seiko group"

"In November 1985, Suwa Seikosha Co., Ltd. and the Epson Corporation merged to form Seiko Epson Corporation"

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5916)

mars2000you's picture

07-01-2021, 08:50

(Problem fixed now by gdx)

By gdx

Enlighted (4492)

gdx's picture

07-01-2021, 08:54

How do you know that Philips printers are made by Seikosha? (not Epson or other)

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5916)

mars2000you's picture

07-01-2021, 08:58

It's a question for Rderooy (I don't have created these pages).

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5916)

mars2000you's picture

15-01-2021, 10:57

@gdx: there's a problem to display these pictures in the wiki:

https://www.msx.org/wiki/File:Elecom_JC-AD2.jpg

https://www.msx.org/wiki/File:Elecom_JC-AD1.jpg

The thumbnails are not created....

Besides, impossible to download the files on my computer ..... Maybe you have forgotten to change their properties....

By gdx

Enlighted (4492)

gdx's picture

15-01-2021, 11:30

I don't have this issue here.

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5916)

mars2000you's picture

15-01-2021, 11:34

Ehmmm.... it seems to be a problem with one of my Chrome extensions.

By gdx

Enlighted (4492)

gdx's picture

17-01-2021, 12:06

You're very nice in Mars2000 but I am strives to put the categories in order from the main to the least relevant but you change everything each time in an order that is not at all relevant.

It doesn't make sense to put the brand or the company name first. It's already sorted in that order and it's indicated on each link.

By mars2000you

Enlighted (5916)

mars2000you's picture

17-01-2021, 12:09

Since so many years, we have build the Wiki this way with the name of the companies as first category and suddenly after so much time you change your mind! Where's the logic in that???

I can understand the change but if you want coherency, do this change for all the products of a company first, then go to the next company.

By gdx

Enlighted (4492)

gdx's picture

17-01-2021, 12:11

So what ? This is not the first time that it has been necessary to change badly classified or badly thought out things.

Page 95/118
88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100